228
against.
one
which led to a further expression of His Excellency's views to the effect that having regard to the use of public money in my possession, he only desired me to return what I had received according to usage and practice established in this colony.
His inability to comply with my request without infringing a principle hitherto maintained in the case of other Civil Servants was regretted. As I have already explained to His Excellency, the case of Mr. Douglas (the one, I presume, to which His Excellency refers) is, I think, totally different to mine, and I fail to see how it can be considered a precedent in my case, probably due to his loss...
my
02-
20
Clerk
228
against.
one
which led to e
further expression of His
Excellency views to the
that having
effect
u Vertuin tonewa
of public money in my
my possession
he only desired me to retorn what I had recieved accor
to usage
and procetint as
estathishice in this colony
his inability
and regretting
to comply with my request without infringing a principle hitherte maintained in the
Case of other Civil Servants. As I have
I have already
Exp
ward to His Excellency
of Mr. Douglas (the I presume to which is Caceetency refers) is I think.
my
02-
20 Rotally different to
that I fail to see how it Can it considered a precedient in
his loss probably . .
my
Clell
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.